Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 2575

09/03/2007 by burmilla_turbo

Scooby doo where are you?

It is with great sadness that I have to inform you that the "Scooby doo" bridge is now without its scooby doo[:(] A mural that has been since the early 80's is now gone forever disapeared beneath black paint.


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 37017

09/03/2007 by nora batty

[:0] That is an absolute disgrace. My kids love that picture. Worse still, a great landmark has gone. A landmark as important to Hertford as the Black Cat roundabout is to the A1. How do we describe that bridge now? Who the hell saw fit to paint over it? Obviously not a local. Outraged of Hertford.


Reply ID 37018

09/03/2007 by burmilla_turbo

Somebody has quite rightfully painted over all the other unsightly graffiti on the bridge but surely they could have spared poor scooby.


Reply ID 37020

09/03/2007 by Reg Varny

I quite agree, this is an outrage. I will be be writing to my MP........... Anyone know who it is?


Reply ID 37021

09/03/2007 by azzza

I don't know, what is the world coming too. My guess is the council read this site and 'Scooby' was brought to their attention. If only they would take notice of the 'pot holes' in the roads and the flodding underpass which is still [after all this time] still flooding on a regular basis.


Reply ID 37023

09/03/2007 by hertford born and bred

quote:
Originally posted by Reg Varny
Anyone know who it is?
I bet it was those pesky kids [:D][:D]


Reply ID 37024

09/03/2007 by nora batty

I am still outraged.[:(!] (And I still live in Hertford). For years that bridge has guided me home after a few too many at The Milly. It was a beacon to all beery staggerers.


Reply ID 37026

09/03/2007 by Tigger

Who is the best cartoonist? I'll supply the paint - Poor Scooby [:(]


Reply ID 37036

09/03/2007 by Ewoowar

Does anyone have a photo of the Scooby art so it can be recreated accurately?


Reply ID 37045

09/03/2007 by burmilla_turbo

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
Does anyone have a photo of the Scooby art so it can be recreated accurately?
Theres a picture of scooby on another topic here supplied by JAMES007.


Reply ID 37046

09/03/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by burmilla_turbo
quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
Does anyone have a photo of the Scooby art so it can be recreated accurately?
Theres a picture of scooby on another topic here supplied by JAMES007.
Thanks, Burmilla........... http://www.hertford.net/yoursay/topic.php?id=2488


Reply ID 37047

09/03/2007 by Capitalist piglet

Not the new remodelled Scooby version please.... (if you've seen it , its almost as much of a travesty as painting over the bridge..)


Reply ID 37049

09/03/2007 by Herbert Lemons

It's grafitti though innit? Much like the self-indulgent bison shaped scribbles were in those caves in, errm, Roydon I think it was. If CSProductions and his mates had filmed it's application this community would be prickly with indignation. Tha fact that it was (a feeble attempt at) Scooby means they only took the top of the bridge. Had it been Scrappy Doo then Banksy's remedial antecedent would be responsible for the top of Balfour Street collapsing into Beane Rd.


Reply ID 37050

10/03/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Herbert Lemons
It's grafitti though innit? Much like the self-indulgent bison shaped scribbles were in those caves in, errm, Roydon I think it was. If CSProductions and his mates had filmed it's application this community would be prickly with indignation. Tha fact that it was (a feeble attempt at) Scooby means they only took the top of the bridge. Had it been Scrappy Doo then Banksy's remedial antecedent would be responsible for the top of Balfour Street collapsing into Beane Rd.
But like the Bison shaped scribbles it has stood the test of time, albeit not quite as long, and has gained affection. Where are the disaffectors who are appeased by the removal of Scooby?


Reply ID 37057

10/03/2007 by Leo Densian

A definite disgrace. Where's Raymond Brown when you need him and a Mercury campaign to re-install Scooby to his rightful place?


Reply ID 37134

11/03/2007 by jez_p

What is the current thinking with graffiti at the moment. It seems that the latest thing is to paint over graffiti on brickwork with brick coloured paint.


Reply ID 37136

11/03/2007 by Herbert Lemons

quote:
Originally posted by jez_p
What is the current thinking with graffiti at the moment. It seems that the latest thing is to paint over graffiti on brickwork with brick coloured paint.
It would be more effective to cover the grafittists with bricks.


Reply ID 37141

11/03/2007 by Rachel

Let me just check I've understood this correctly. There is good graffiti and bad graffiti. A picture of a cartoon dog is good graffiti. It somehow doesn't lower the tone of a street and encourage kids to put other graffiti up. OK, I've got that straight. Tigger, you offered the paint, I can certainly do a good likeness of the Hanna-Barbara canine in question, I'll come round to your street, OK? Or any of the other people who have indicated their regret that this graffiti has been painted out, let me know where you live and I'll be happy to paint a cartoon dog on a wall or bridge near you. [:)] On the subject of graffiti, has anyone noticed a funny stencil of a little boy's face spray-painted a few times on one of the turnings off St Andrew's Street, near North Road? I don't know what it means but I quite like it. I doubt the residents share my fondness for it. Does anyone remember that mysterious slogan about the Flying Hop on the railway bridge on the Hertford road into WGC? [;)] That was there for years. Not graffiti, but there's a big hand-painted sign for 'Hay £1.60 a bale' near the A120 Little Hadham traffic lights which has been known for years in our family as the ZIGO sign because of the clumsy way £1.60 has been painted.


Reply ID 37144

11/03/2007 by Ewoowar

I think the point regarding the Scooby is that it appears to have been around for many years and even on this forum I don't recall many comments against it. If graffiti offends people then it should be removed, particularly if it offends those who have to live close to it. If people complained about Scooby then it was rightly removed. I have also seen the stencil on the wall of Turners. Very Banksyesque............a lot better than the cr*p appearing along the wall on the A414 by the roundabout at the junction with Cross Lane


Reply ID 37153

11/03/2007 by burmilla_turbo

I doubt there were any specific complaints about the Scooby picture, I mean its been there for at least 20 years and not been a problem. What probably happened is a complaint to the council about all the other scrawl on the other side of the bridge. They then sent out a contractor to paint over the grafitti who painted over everything.


Reply ID 37154

11/03/2007 by Capitalist piglet

Ah! Interesting When does graffiti become (art, cultural heritage, Grade II listed ,a national monument ) – Is the graffiti, in say the Ramesseum, which 18th C French & English soldiers inscribed their names in the stone, as important as the 19th Dynasty artefacts around them. We have a similar problem with the old Farts in the Other Bar in the WH… I think I’ve heard this before - When I was at school I fought the arguments of the Pink Floyd/Yes fraternity (“there’re art man”) and indeed got ostracised cos I liked Slade… Sorry; off on one … back to Scooby…


Reply ID 37165

11/03/2007 by Tigger

quote:
Originally posted by Rachel
Let me just check I've understood this correctly. There is good graffiti and bad graffiti. A picture of a cartoon dog is good graffiti. It somehow doesn't lower the tone of a street and encourage kids to put other graffiti up. OK, I've got that straight. Tigger, you offered the paint, I can certainly do a good likeness of the Hanna-Barbara canine in question, I'll come round to your street, OK? Or any of the other people who have indicated their regret that this graffiti has been painted out, let me know where you live and I'll be happy to paint a cartoon dog on a wall or bridge near you. [:)] On the subject of graffiti, has anyone noticed a funny stencil of a little boy's face spray-painted a few times on one of the turnings off St Andrew's Street, near North Road? I don't know what it means but I quite like it. I doubt the residents share my fondness for it. Does anyone remember that mysterious slogan about the Flying Hop on the railway bridge on the Hertford road into WGC? [;)] That was there for years. Not graffiti, but there's a big hand-painted sign for 'Hay £1.60 a bale' near the A120 Little Hadham traffic lights which has been known for years in our family as the ZIGO sign because of the clumsy way £1.60 has been painted.
Point Taken - It was there for so long it was part of Hertford. I am not condoning Grafitti in any way, it just seems a shame to lose him.


Reply ID 37180

12/03/2007 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by jez_p
What is the current thinking with graffiti at the moment. It seems that the latest thing is to paint over graffiti on brickwork with brick coloured paint.
Personally, I think that looks worse.


Reply ID 37189

12/03/2007 by nora batty

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalist piglet
Ah! Interesting When does graffiti become (art, cultural heritage, Grade II listed ,a national monument )
If it is not likely to be offensive and makes people laugh or think? I object to people scrawling allegations about another persons sexual orientation or making aggressive statements, but Scooby Doo was drawn to make people smile. (Or is there an Iconic Cartoon Party that I'm not aware of?) I also rather like the strange stencil of 3 skeletal figures on the drinks kiosk in Hartham Park.


Reply ID 37198

12/03/2007 by Capitalist piglet

quote:
Originally posted by nora batty
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalist piglet
Ah! Interesting When does graffiti become (art, cultural heritage, Grade II listed ,a national monument )
If it is not likely to be offensive and makes people laugh or think? I object to people scrawling allegations about another persons sexual orientation or making aggressive statements, but Scooby Doo was drawn to make people smile. (Or is there an Iconic Cartoon Party that I'm not aware of?) I also rather like the strange stencil of 3 skeletal figures on the drinks kiosk in Hartham Park.
Nora - don't get me wrong - I thought Scooby was excellent it was there, as far as I can remember, as long as I've been in Hertford & I'm rather saddened by its demise. List it I say, in retropection, & demand its return in its full glory! Were you referring to the unfortunate long posted allegation about a certain Mr M Khan which remained for years on the North Circular near New Southgate - Anyone know if its still there?


Reply ID 37199

12/03/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Capitalist piglet
quote:
Originally posted by nora batty
quote:
Originally posted by Capitalist piglet
Ah! Interesting When does graffiti become (art, cultural heritage, Grade II listed ,a national monument )
If it is not likely to be offensive and makes people laugh or think? I object to people scrawling allegations about another persons sexual orientation or making aggressive statements, but Scooby Doo was drawn to make people smile. (Or is there an Iconic Cartoon Party that I'm not aware of?) I also rather like the strange stencil of 3 skeletal figures on the drinks kiosk in Hartham Park.
Nora - don't get me wrong - I thought Scooby was excellent it was there, as far as I can remember, as long as I've been in Hertford & I'm rather saddened by its demise. List it I say, in retropection, & demand its return in its full glory! Were you referring to the unfortunate long posted allegation about a certain Mr M Khan which remained for years on the North Circular near New Southgate - Anyone know if its still there?
M. Khan's preferences are no longer the subject of daily conjecture for passing commuters. Similarly.........'Big Beer Side' is no longer on the train bridge in Edmonton.


Reply ID 37291

13/03/2007 by Fish Wife

I'm sorry to hear that Scooby Do is now Scooby Don't. He was there back in '76 and fascinated each of my children. I can't imagine that he offended anyone - he wasn't performing lewd acts, swearing or condoning drug taking - just a plain, naive, white-line drawing. Perhaps if he had been pictured bareback riding, smoking a spliff and effing and blinding he would still be there, or am I being cynical?


Reply ID 37304

13/03/2007 by Ewoowar

30 yards away from Scooby Bridge is the wall by the scout hut which is a mess of graffiti. I notice that was not removed by the same people.


Reply ID 37307

13/03/2007 by James007

So who owns that wall Ewoowar? BR (or what was) must have owned the bridge but not that wall by the scout hut that is still covered.


Reply ID 37309

13/03/2007 by Ewoowar

Who removed Scooby? Network Rail? The council?


Reply ID 37513

16/03/2007 by Admin

[url="http://www.hertford.net/yoursay/topic.php?id=2602"]Scooby Doo is back![/url]


30 replies