Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 3848

08/10/2008 by buzz

Ware Park Mill, Bengeo

I take it that many other Bengeo residents will have received a leaflet regarding planning applications in respect of Ware Park Mill in Riversdale. If the allegations contained therein (it seems to have been published anonymously) are correct, it would be a gross intrusion into the area. There are details in the leaflet about how to register objections which must be received before Monday 20th October. (Sorry Admin, accidentally placed this on the wrong thread, can you relocate if for me please)


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 55664

09/10/2008 by exiled_in_Reading

s'cuse my ignorance but where is this?


Reply ID 55665

09/10/2008 by Marilyn

Its between Hertford and Ware on the river bend on the opposite bank , I think the building that has a new roof on it? http://www.londonancestor.com/bells/1821-ware.htm


Reply ID 55667

09/10/2008 by Steve

I think it's where the Lee and Lee Navigation meet. If you walk from Hertford Lock along the long straight channel to where it joins the Lee proper, opposite is what's left of the old mill. [url="http://maps.google.co.uk/maps?f=q&hl=en&q=Mill+House,+Ware+Park,+Ware,+Hertfordshire+SG12,+United+Kingdom&sll=53.800651,-4.064941&sspn=12.396752,30.9375&ie=UTF8&lr=lang_en&cd=1&geocode=FY6FFgMduwT__w&ll=51.808535,-0.072484&spn=0.012657,0.04652&z=15&iwloc=addr"]Ware Park Mill (Google Maps)[/url]


Reply ID 55668

09/10/2008 by Steve

Planning applications below. 5 storeys in the green belt, at a location that I would describe as rural, sounds a little over the top! http://e-services.eastherts.gov.uk/swiftlg/apas/run/Wphappcriteria.showApplications?regfromdate=15-sep-2008®todate=21-sep-2008&DispResultsAs=wphappsresweek1


Reply ID 55673

09/10/2008 by lemonjelly

The five storey building will provide 11 residences, which will no doubt be luxury apartments. There are also applications to convert a garage into a single bedroom dwelling and a barn into a three bedroom dwelling. So, that's 13 residences in total. Will the people that end up living here want all their cars parked in garages? That will require even more development. This is also being discussed on Ware Online. http://www.wareonline.co.uk/haveyoursay/topic.php?id=3213


Reply ID 55680

09/10/2008 by Ted Badger

quote:
Originally posted by buzz There are details in the leaflet about how to register objections which must be received before Monday 20th October.
Any chance of posting them here?


Reply ID 55691

09/10/2008 by buzz

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Badger
quote:
Originally posted by buzz There are details in the leaflet about how to register objections which must be received before Monday 20th October.
Any chance of posting them here?
I would have tried to scan the leaflet, but my scanner is dead. The leaflet states that the planner handling the applications is Michael Chalk, direct phone 01992 531556 the applications are listed on the EHDC planning page and you can either write to EHDC Development Control, Wallfields, Pegs Lane, Hertford, SG13 8EQ OR email planning(at)eastherts.gov.uk (substite @ for "at") and it is suggests contacting local Councillors. There is a large version of the leaflet (which is very professionally done) on a post outside the Old Barge. Hope this helps


Reply ID 56052

19/10/2008 by Newfy

Sorry Folks. This wasn't meant to be anonymous. The posters and flyers were created by the residents at Riversdale who are strongly opposed to a development of this scale. The posters state the 20th October as the dead line to submit any objections. You can actually do this up to 24th October. This development could consist of a luxury 5 storey apartment block, an conversion, 4 residential moorings, a Cafe, a studio apartment and a boat house. The access to these properties is via a single track lane which is owned by the residents. This development could make this lane very dangerous for not only the residents but the walkers, cyclists, joggers, horse riders and children that currently use the lane for recreational persuits!! PLEASE OBJECT and help us to preserve the rural, safe character of Riversdale at Ware Park!!! Many many Thanks...........................


Reply ID 56053

19/10/2008 by Newfy

I meant to say that there are lots of posters around town and on Hartham and the Meads. You can object by e-mailing East Herts Planning at: [email protected]. Quoting reference 3/08/1384/FP. If you need a leaflet that are a couple of pouches full of them outside the 2 houses immediately either side of the proposed development at Riversdale................ You can access the lane by going to the bottom of Ware Park Road and turning right along the dirt track (just before the road turns to the left up to Ware Park Manor.) I hope this helps.......... DEAD LINE 24th OCTOBER 2008...............


Reply ID 56091

20/10/2008 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
The access to these properties is via a single track lane which is owned by the residents.
Not according to Hertfordshire Highways it isn't.


Reply ID 56093

20/10/2008 by Marilyn

I know where the Mill is but can someone tell me what costitutes Riversdale I have not come accross it as a development before.


Reply ID 56097

20/10/2008 by Newfy

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
The access to these properties is via a single track lane which is owned by the residents.
Not according to Hertfordshire Highways it isn't.
I can assure you that the lane is a "Bridle Way, number 97" which means that residents and their visitors have access across it to get to their properties, but non residents only have rights of access on foot, horse, horse and cart or cycle. It is owned by the residents. I have obtained copies of the rights of ownership from the Land Registry which confirms this.


Reply ID 56098

20/10/2008 by Newfy

quote:
Originally posted by Marilyn
I know where the Mill is but can someone tell me what costitutes Riversdale I have not come accross it as a development before.
A number of the houses along the lane are called "Riversdale something". The field is also referred to as the Riversdale Field. It differentiates between upper and lower Ware Park. Unfortunately it is the lane with "no name".


Reply ID 56100

20/10/2008 by Marilyn

quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
quote:
Originally posted by Marilyn
I know where the Mill is but can someone tell me what costitutes Riversdale I have not come accross it as a development before.
A number of the houses along the lane are called "Riversdale something". The field is also referred to as the Riversdale Field. It differentiates between upper and lower Ware Park. Unfortunately it is the lane with "no name".
Thanks now I know, wondered why I had not come accross it before being born and bred in Bengeo the lane with no name explains it!!


Reply ID 56108

21/10/2008 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
The access to these properties is via a single track lane which is owned by the residents.
Not according to Hertfordshire Highways it isn't.
I can assure you that the lane is a "Bridle Way, number 97" which means that residents and their visitors have access across it to get to their properties, but non residents only have rights of access on foot, horse, horse and cart or cycle. It is owned by the residents. I have obtained copies of the rights of ownership from the Land Registry which confirms this.
Maybe I'm missing something here. Surely, if you and your fellow residents own the road, can you not deny access over your private property to the new development? - both to the developers' contractors and potential buyers of the new properties? (unless of course they're on foot, horse, horse and cart or cycle!). I would imagine that ownership of the thoroughfare is through some sort of corporate body or Trust in which the residents have an interest. As for the anonymity issue, it does seem to me to be basic communications skills that if you put up (ie publish) posters, you provide some indication as to who you are and include contact information, ie who you are speaking on behalf of and what authority do you have?


Reply ID 56112

21/10/2008 by Ted Badger

quote:
Originally posted by Steve ...it does seem to me to be basic communications skills that if you put up (ie publish) posters, you provide some indication as to who you are and include contact information, ie who you are speaking on behalf of and what authority do you have?
Blimey! - the point of putting up posters is to raise awareness of the issue, just as posting details on a forum such as this. I wouldn't start knocking communication skills because they (sic) have done a pretty good job.


Reply ID 56113

21/10/2008 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by Ted Badger
quote:
Originally posted by Steve ...it does seem to me to be basic communications skills that if you put up (ie publish) posters, you provide some indication as to who you are and include contact information, ie who you are speaking on behalf of and what authority do you have?
Blimey! - the point of putting up posters is to raise awareness of the issue, just as posting details on a forum such as this. I wouldn't start knocking communication skills because they (sic) have done a pretty good job.
Point taken.


Reply ID 56154

21/10/2008 by Newfy

The point of the posters was to increase awareness and advise of best course of action which was to go to EHDC to object by 24th October. All the info required was detailed on the posters and flyers. Extra copies of which can be obtained from outside the houses along Riversdale................


Reply ID 56628

01/11/2008 by SMT

Hi Newfy, as the closing date for comment has now passed do you think the posters will be taken down? I've seen them from the Woolpack in Hertford, all the way to near the Carmelite Monastery in Ware; with the laminate and MDF I don't think they will degrade quickly!! And I nag my (County) council to take down old of date notices too :-) Please can you post the outcome of planning decision on this forum? Many thanks.


Reply ID 56724

03/11/2008 by Newfy

Your point is very valid and I can assure you that they will be taken down. We have left them up to continue to create awareness. There is an East Herts District Council mtg to discuss the planning application on either 19th Nov or 17th Dec. This meeting is open to the public. Once a decission has been made I can assure you the notices will be taken down!!!


Reply ID 56844

05/11/2008 by buzz

I have just received three emails from EHDC planning regarding applications in respect of Ware Park Mill. They stated that with regard to (a) Garage conversion.........Refused (b) Barn Conversion...........Refused (c) Workshop..................Refused Apparently the decisions were made last night.


Reply ID 57324

18/11/2008 by Newfy

Yes this is correct!! We are pleased to say that 4 out of the 5 planning applications have been refused. This includes applications for the residential moorings, Barn Conversion, Garage conversion to dwelling plus studio and erection of boathouse for use as studio/flat/workshop. This leaves the MAIN planning application (for the Mill and Mill House Restoration to a 5 story block of flats) still to be decided. Due to it's size it has to go to the East Herts District Council Committee mtg which we have been advised will be heard at the agenda on 17th Dec 2008. (Venue TBC) This mtg is open to the public if you wish to attend. One of the residents from the area has been given a 3 min slot to convince the council not to grant permission for the flats.They obviously include other factors as well..... The dead line for objections has now past but any support on the 17th Dec will be gratefully received. I will post the exact details of the meeting as soon as I have received them! BUZZ YOU WILL BE PLEASED TO KNOW WE HAVE ALSO STARTED TO TAKE SOME OF THE POSTERS DOWN................


Reply ID 57328

18/11/2008 by SMT

quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
BUZZ YOU WILL BE PLEASED TO KNOW WE HAVE ALSO STARTED TO TAKE SOME OF THE POSTERS DOWN................
It was me who mentioned the posters, although you don't need to shout [;)]!! You certainly had an active campaign; I saw them in near Byde Street today! Committee meetings are normally held at the Council Office (Wallfields); and there are ordinarily 3 slots to speak (one would be reserved for applicant). Slot needs to be booked in advance and you can't go over 3 minutes; I have very rarely at any council seen councillors accept comments from the 'general public' but it is good to show a presence.


Reply ID 57332

18/11/2008 by buzz

Wasn't me who said anything about taking the posters down!!


Reply ID 57343

19/11/2008 by thefair1973

quote:
I have very rarely at any council seen councillors accept comments from the 'general public' but it is good to show a presence.
Why would they take notice of the public? We just stupidly vote them in so they can do what they like and pay no attention to what we, the voting public, want. They're all the same, so to me, it makes no real difference who you vote in. May as well all follow Hertlepool's lead and vote in a monkey (they voted for Angus the Monkey to be their mayor)


Reply ID 57348

19/11/2008 by SMT

quote:
Originally posted by thefair1973
quote:
I have very rarely at any council seen councillors accept comments from the 'general public' but it is good to show a presence.
Why would they take notice of the public? We just stupidly vote them in so they can do what they like and pay no attention to what we, the voting public, want. They're all the same, so to me, it makes no real difference who you vote in. May as well all follow Hertlepool's lead and vote in a monkey (they voted for Angus the Monkey to be their mayor)
I was trying to clarify that even though the public can attend the meeting, they don't have a right to speak from the floor. The only way for the public to speak is via the consultation process (which is now closed) in the allocated 3 minute slots. Otherwise the meetings would go on for hours and hours and hours!! I think Hartlepool voted in the football club mascot H'Angus [:)] Does Hertford Town have a mascot?!


Reply ID 57363

19/11/2008 by Newfy

Sorry Buzz!! I got confused as to who said what?? We will take the posters down though and the info about the 3 min slot and the general public not being able to speak is correct...........I just feel the more people that show up to support even if they can't speak does help to illustrate interest in the planning application. I'll update the site when I know location and time of meeting on 17th Dec.[:)]


Reply ID 57400

20/11/2008 by buzz

quote:
Originally posted by thefair1973
quote:
I have very rarely at any council seen councillors accept comments from the 'general public' but it is good to show a presence.
Why would they take notice of the public? We just stupidly vote them in so they can do what they like and pay no attention to what we, the voting public, want. They're all the same, so to me, it makes no real difference who you vote in. May as well all follow Hertlepool's lead and vote in a monkey (they voted for Angus the Monkey to be their mayor)
The last monkey to visit Hartlepool wasn't so lucky! (Sorry Admin....I know....completely off-topic)


Reply ID 58367

20/12/2008 by Newfy

The final planning application to build a modern five storey glass fronted apartment block in the green belt has now been refused. This is great news. Thanks to all those who have supported us!!!![:)][:)][:)]


Reply ID 58374

20/12/2008 by buzz

quote:
Originally posted by Newfy
The final planning application to build a modern five storey glass fronted apartment block in the green belt has now been refused. This is great news. Thanks to all those who have supported us!!!![:)][:)][:)]
Excellent!.........except, was this the not unknown ploy of applying for something that you know will be refused, hoping the planners will accept the revised planning application which is what you wanted in the first place?


Reply ID 68925

04/11/2009 by Steve

Pleased to see that the developer has had his appeal turned down... http://www.hertford.net/blog http://www.hertford.net/blog


31 replies