Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 3556

23/04/2008 by shunt

Teacher's strike.

I'm wondering what effect members are expecting from the strike this week and what they think of it all. Both ours are attending school tomorrow, though one has just announced he may not have any lessons as such.


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 51942

23/04/2008 by Ewoowar

I believe there is one school in Hertford that will be severely impacted and will have to close for the day.


Reply ID 51943

23/04/2008 by hertford born and bred

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
I believe there is one school in Hertford that will be severely impacted and will have to close for the day.
[url="http://www.hertbeat.com/article.php?id=529960"]Mill Mead Primary, Hertford [/url]


Reply ID 51944

23/04/2008 by nora batty

Yrs 8 and 11 at RH are off school.


Reply ID 51946

23/04/2008 by Leo Densian

Abel Smith open as usual


Reply ID 51951

23/04/2008 by minnie

Hollybush will be open as well


Reply ID 51960

24/04/2008 by newgirl

My two are both off from Morgans today although some classes are still running. I have mixed views about the strike and have had to take a day off from my own office to look after them but what has really made me angry are these two things - 1. Younger child came home with NUT propaganda in the book bag 2. Older child had been given two pieces of homework last night to do at home today whilst off from school and hand in tomorrow morning. So not only do I have to take time off work, I have to do the teachers work for them! I appreciate that the children will now be behind but that's the consequence of the strike, isn't it? I don't think you go on strike expecting someone else to do your work for you. Am I over-reacting to this? I was thinking of writing to complain to the head teacher


Reply ID 51962

24/04/2008 by shunt

Curious that NUT claim this is all about attracting new people to want to become teachers, but have missed that the principle barrier to recruitment is not pay, but public image and lack of prestige. In my opinion, they have further embarrassed their members by this action.


Reply ID 51967

24/04/2008 by wingnut

quote:
2. Older child had been given two pieces of homework last night to do at home today whilst off from school and hand in tomorrow morning. So not only do I have to take time off work, I have to do the teachers work for them! I appreciate that the children will now be behind but that's the consequence of the strike, isn't it? I don't think you go on strike expecting someone else to do your work for you.
I think the homework is for the child to do..


Reply ID 51968

24/04/2008 by Capitalist piglet

quote:
Originally posted by wingnut
2. Older child had been given two pieces of homework last night to do at home today whilst off from school and hand in tomorrow morning. So not only do I have to take time off work, I have to do the teachers work for them! I appreciate that the children will now be behind but that's the consequence of the strike, isn't it? I don't think you go on strike expecting someone else to do your work for you. I think the homework is for the child to do..
Am I missing something here but ..... yes. Wot work? Teacher gives out homework , pupil completes it (at home presumably this being homework) pupil gives homework to teacher (usually cribbed off the net). That’s how it worked in my time (w.w.w. not withstanding). Where does parent fit into the equation? Other than to possibly offer bacon sarnis & fizzy drink on occasions… (never happened to me, had to make ‘em meself)


Reply ID 51971

24/04/2008 by dennismoore

quote:
Originally posted by wingnut
2. Older child had been given two pieces of homework last night to do at home today whilst off from school and hand in tomorrow morning. So not only do I have to take time off work, I have to do the teachers work for them! I appreciate that the children will now be behind but that's the consequence of the strike, isn't it? I don't think you go on strike expecting someone else to do your work for you. I think the homework is for the child to do..
That'll be the homework the teacher will be marking in their own time over the weekend then, along with all the other usual paperwork.[:)] At least we still have teachers in Hertford, but unfortunately I can't see how in the future a new teacher could ever afford to settle down and live around here on present rates of pay.


Reply ID 51974

25/04/2008 by newgirl

Unfortunately child is not that old that you can just leave them to get on with it. I know we used to get on with it ourselves back in the olden days but I never had homework from the age of five onwards, did you? Also - if I have to use one of my precious annual leave days (and bear in mind that I don't get one quarter of the days a teacher has) then I don't want someone else dictating to me what I do with it.


Reply ID 51975

25/04/2008 by MrsDickie

Anyone who thinks its as easy as leaving the child to get on with it obviously hasn't got (or has forgotten what it's like to have) yourng children


Reply ID 51976

25/04/2008 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
quote:
Originally posted by wingnut
2. Older child had been given two pieces of homework last night to do at home today whilst off from school and hand in tomorrow morning. So not only do I have to take time off work, I have to do the teachers work for them! I appreciate that the children will now be behind but that's the consequence of the strike, isn't it? I don't think you go on strike expecting someone else to do your work for you. I think the homework is for the child to do..
That'll be the homework the teacher will be marking in their own time over the weekend then, along with all the other usual paperwork.[:)] At least we still have teachers in Hertford, but unfortunately I can't see how in the future a new teacher could ever afford to settle down and live around here on present rates of pay.
£32,000 starting wage seems ok to me, when you factor in all the other benefits. Teaching trades off wages for benefits. Those benefits are it's attraction. One of those benefits is 600 less contracted hours than most other professions on similar money. Time enough for some marking, I would think.


Reply ID 51977

25/04/2008 by simcut

You'd have to pay me at least £40k to put up with the kids of today.... :/ lol


Reply ID 51979

25/04/2008 by dennismoore

Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.


Reply ID 51980

25/04/2008 by Leo Densian

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.
I know of one recently qualified teacher who has to have an evening job as well to make ends meet.


Reply ID 51981

25/04/2008 by Capitalist piglet

quote:
Originally posted by newgirl
Unfortunately child is not that old that you can just leave them to get on with it. I know we used to get on with it ourselves back in the olden days but I never had homework from the age of five onwards, did you?
Fair enough newgirl. Seem to (very vaugly) being allowed to have a childhood back then.. but I did'nt start myeducation under this Tor.. whoops New labour govt with its fanatical worship of stats & tests..[:(] MrsDickie, the point I was making was more around doing the homework for them or giving answers when asked (instead of asking good questions to help them work it out for themselves - which granted you may need to be around for some of the time)In terms of policing them doing the work ... well we found over the last few years that the decommissioning of the PC with a promise of recommission on completion usually did the trick.. (& he's now doing well at his college [:)]) Just as well I did'nt coach him on spelling though...


Reply ID 51984

25/04/2008 by nora batty

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.
Not bad for only working 9 months of the year, guaranteed a week off every 6 weeks, guaranteed Christmas and Easter weeks off. Many workers in other professions have to cover Christmas and Easter. Many people with a career work more than their contracted hours. It's the difference between getting a wage and a salary. If you want to be paid for the hours you work rather than the job you do, get a job that is hourly paid or become self-employed. It seems to me that teachers jobs have been made easier - what with classroom assistants and "non-contact" time etc. not to mention the amount of training courses they seem to be allowed to go on. (Do they still do dinner and playground duty?). It also seems to me that teaching used to be a vocation and nobody was counting the hours, just taking great pleasure in playing their part in shaping future citizens. Nowadays graduates become teachers not for the pleasure of teaching but because they don't know what else to do with their degree. No wonder they leave the profession - they don't really know what they want to do and find teaching is actually much harder or not as stimulating as they expected. Teachers seem to think they automatically have a right to hero-worship from the wider public beacuse they carry the title "teacher". Respect has to be earned, and in my view this is done by inspiring children. It's also one of the few jobs where you don't struggle with childcare over the holidays. Consider the cost of a minimum 2 months' childcare for 2 children that many of us pay out of our annual salaries - add that to your pay. So many primary school teachers I know are mothers who have switched careers for this very reason. They have an ancient degree in some daft subject then do just 1 year's training, et voila, a teacher is born. The best teachers, in my opinion, have done BEd's, have continued to study their specialist subject and are passionate about sharing their knowledge. Does anyone know if the striking staff get paid while on strike? If they do, they've now had a day off on full pay and that's their pay rise, in my opinion. Rant over[:)]


Reply ID 51985

25/04/2008 by codek2

no; they dont get paid. Well not normally; But whether they bother to update the records as to who was in and who wasnt is anyones guess.


Reply ID 51987

25/04/2008 by dennismoore

My partner is a teacher and I sometimes count the actual number of hours she works. Yes, the holidays are a big plus especially when it comes to childcare, but even then work creeps in. For example, out of ten days off this easter my partner was working for three of them. Not to mention the usual Sunday evening of planning. Teaching is still a vocation but not one you'd want to take up if you can't afford to raise a family near where you work. That (apart from the sheer hard work, people expect it to be a cushy number) is why there's an increasing problem with recruiting and holding on to teachers. Those striking won't have been paid but you can bet that most will have been sat at home for much of the day doing paperwork.


Reply ID 51991

25/04/2008 by wingnut

Teaching is a great job, yes the holidays are good, and the pay is too..the dispute should not have been about pay but focussed on the stupid amount of paperwork and new initiatives. from 1944 to 1987 there were hardly any changes, since then there have been changes on a yearly basis..I doubt if any child has followed an unchanged curriculum since then. The hours can be long but that is offset by the holidays (though with no flexibility holidays are always on the pricier side!) However one thing to bear in mind when you compare jobs, how often in other jobs do you need to make 10 decisions a minute, respond to 2 urgent requests that cannot be put on hold, per minute have fellow 'professionals such as social services, ed psychs not believe a word you say and have your results compared in the national/local press with no chance to explain. I love the job but it seems all to easy to knock us.[:)]


Reply ID 51992

25/04/2008 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.
I was referring to a secondary school entry level, as officially posted with 0-1 years experience. Where the 50-60 hour week comes from, I'm not sure. Not one of the teachers I know (including the headteacher within the family) does anything like that. In fact, all of them chose the role as a lifesyle choice, because it's so much shorter hours than a commercial career. A sixty hour week is eight in the morning to six in the evening, six days a week. Find me a teacher who does that 48 weeks per year.


Reply ID 51994

26/04/2008 by simcut

can you imagine working those hours and being paid pennies AND having to put up with the gobby little gits that are our youth these days? :S


Reply ID 51996

26/04/2008 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by simcut
...the gobby little gits that are our youth these days? :S
A gross generalisation I think. Would you like to qualify that statement? [:)]


Reply ID 51998

26/04/2008 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by wingnut
Teaching is a great job, yes the holidays are good, and the pay is too..the dispute should not have been about pay but focussed on the stupid amount of paperwork and new initiatives. from 1944 to 1987 there were hardly any changes, since then there have been changes on a yearly basis..I doubt if any child has followed an unchanged curriculum since then. The hours can be long but that is offset by the holidays (though with no flexibility holidays are always on the pricier side!) However one thing to bear in mind when you compare jobs, how often in other jobs do you need to make 10 decisions a minute, respond to 2 urgent requests that cannot be put on hold, per minute have fellow 'professionals such as social services, ed psychs not believe a word you say and have your results compared in the national/local press with no chance to explain. I love the job but it seems all to easy to knock us.[:)]
I'd say those are about average pressures in the non-teaching world. To earn more, you'd be expected to do all that and much, much more, and for longer each day, and for more days per year. For those us with children, there's also no flexibility in holiday dates, just 8 or 9 weeks less of them and of course some of that is taken up by all the inset days which we have to take as holiday. Oh and if you think teaching has changed a lot, take a look at employment law. We have been operating under different laws every month. Even builders face significant changes in law and paperwork. I'm not knocking teachers, just those who think they are somehow doing a harder job than the rest of the world. Teaching's a good job, generally done well and with integrity. Of course it has it's trials and challenges, but it's not a special case.


Reply ID 52004

27/04/2008 by dennismoore

quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.
I was referring to a secondary school entry level, as officially posted with 0-1 years experience. Where the 50-60 hour week comes from, I'm not sure. Not one of the teachers I know (including the headteacher within the family) does anything like that. In fact, all of them chose the role as a lifesyle choice, because it's so much shorter hours than a commercial career. A sixty hour week is eight in the morning to six in the evening, six days a week. Find me a teacher who does that 48 weeks per year.
Typically it's eight in the morning til six in the evening plus two or three hours at home after that. Add to that several hours at the weekend. With report writing coming up, weekends will disappear altogether. The holidays are great (although not entirely work free) so you won't find many teachers complaining, but the problem we're all going to have to face is that newly qualified teachers just can't afford to settle in this part of the country.


Reply ID 52007

27/04/2008 by shunt

quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
quote:
Originally posted by shunt
quote:
Originally posted by dennismoore
Actually, for a classroom teacher the starting wage is £20,000 with a maximum of £34,280 for the most experienced. Not much for a 50-60 hour week.
I was referring to a secondary school entry level, as officially posted with 0-1 years experience. Where the 50-60 hour week comes from, I'm not sure. Not one of the teachers I know (including the headteacher within the family) does anything like that. In fact, all of them chose the role as a lifesyle choice, because it's so much shorter hours than a commercial career. A sixty hour week is eight in the morning to six in the evening, six days a week. Find me a teacher who does that 48 weeks per year.
Typically it's eight in the morning til six in the evening plus two or three hours at home after that. Add to that several hours at the weekend. With report writing coming up, weekends will disappear altogether. The holidays are great (although not entirely work free) so you won't find many teachers complaining, but the problem we're all going to have to face is that newly qualified teachers just can't afford to settle in this part of the country.
Agreed, but then neither can newly qualified anything. Your partner seems to work as many hours as the rest of us, when not on holidays. That is extraordinary for a teacher. None of the teachers I know do anything like that.


27 replies