Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 2616

21/03/2007 by Steve

Was that the Queen's Flight?

A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 37749

21/03/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?
Why would a private jet accompany an airliner with the Queen on board?


Reply ID 37750

21/03/2007 by Marilyn

Could it have been some sort of filming? They would need 2 planes faily close for that I guess, sorry didn't see it though.


Reply ID 37752

21/03/2007 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?
Why would a private jet accompany an airliner with the Queen on board?
I didn't say the Queen was on board did I! [;)] Put it another way, why would a BAe146 have a private jet alongside the port wing (we're talking a distance of about about 50m here)


Reply ID 37754

21/03/2007 by Arty

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?
Why would a private jet accompany an airliner with the Queen on board?
I didn't say the Queen was on board did I! [;)] Put it another way, why would a BAe146 have a private jet alongside the port wing (we're talking a distance of about about 50m here)
Perhaps the other jet had the corgis in it[:)]


Reply ID 37758

21/03/2007 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Steve
quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
quote:
Originally posted by Steve
A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?
Why would a private jet accompany an airliner with the Queen on board?
I didn't say the Queen was on board did I! [;)] Put it another way, why would a BAe146 have a private jet alongside the port wing (we're talking a distance of about about 50m here)
What? You start a thread titled 'Was that the Queens Flight?'. Then you post, "A Bae146 just flew over closely escorted by a private jet. I know Liz uses a 146 and and I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner. Did anyone else see it?". Assuming 'Liz' is the Queen and that you can't imagine any other circumstance I think you are linking the Queen and the flight pretty closely. And while we are all being so pedantic I might as well point out that I never stated that you said the Queen was on board the damn thing. I wrote, "Why would a private jet accompany an airliner with the Queen on board?". This was simply questioning your statement, "I can't image any other circumstance where a private jet would be allowed so close to an airliner".


Reply ID 37762

21/03/2007 by Capitalist piglet

Boys...............


Reply ID 37763

21/03/2007 by Ewoowar

Apologies. Note to self.......... don't be such a pedantic old @rse.


Reply ID 37766

21/03/2007 by Ewoowar

I was going to research the subject but the thought of having my front door kicked in, being dragged away by the police and having my pc confiscated disuaded me.


Reply ID 37786

22/03/2007 by Leo Densian

Royal flights are no longer advertised as it were for obvious security reasons and the old method of establishing of what was known as a 'purple airway' was disbanded some time ago. The present system is to establish temporary Class A airspace without any specific mention of a Royal Flight and these do appear quite regularly in the Notams (Notice to airmen). But in answer to the original question, I have no idea [:)]


Reply ID 37792

22/03/2007 by arkwright

Steve, I think the royal 146 is white with a red tail, could you discern the colour?


Reply ID 37793

22/03/2007 by 2929paul

Did you see anyone waving out of the window? Often a bit of a giveaway.


Reply ID 37794

22/03/2007 by Steve

They no longer have the red tail I believe. There were no distinct colours or markings. I think it may have been http://www.raf.mod.uk/structure/32squadron.cfm Specifically these two... http://www.raf.mod.uk/structure/32squadron.cfm http://www.raf.mod.uk/structure/32squadron.cfm


Reply ID 37859

23/03/2007 by SallyB

No Class A airspace was established over Hertford at that time on 21 March 2007, so it would not have been a royal flight. I can offer no other explanation for the flight. Practising for an airshow perhaps or RAF training; pilots all need practise at formation flying - it is not easy!


Reply ID 37866

23/03/2007 by dytter

quote:
Originally posted by SallyB
No Class A airspace was established over Hertford at that time on 21 March 2007, so it would not have been a royal flight. I can offer no other explanation for the flight. Practising for an airshow perhaps or RAF training; pilots all need practise at formation flying - it is not easy!
Class A airspace is permanently established "over Hertford". It depends entirely what altitude the aircraft were flying at whether or not they were in it or below it.


Reply ID 37869

23/03/2007 by Arty

quote:
Originally posted by dytter
quote:
Originally posted by SallyB
No Class A airspace was established over Hertford at that time on 21 March 2007, so it would not have been a royal flight. I can offer no other explanation for the flight. Practising for an airshow perhaps or RAF training; pilots all need practise at formation flying - it is not easy!
Class A airspace is permanently established "over Hertford". It depends entirely what altitude the aircraft were flying at whether or not they were in it or below it.
What's Class A airspace, please?


Reply ID 37872

23/03/2007 by SallyB

What I intended to say was: no *temporary* Class A airspace was established over Hertford; ie, below 2500 ft - the base of Class A airspace above Hertford. Sorry, I assumed that the Class A airspace starting at 2500 ft was obvious - 'you can't establish something that is already there' was probably what I was thinking at the time of posting. It's been a busy day and I rushed the post without thinking it through properly. Sally


Reply ID 37877

23/03/2007 by Steve

quote:
Originally posted by Arty
What's Class A airspace, please?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Airspace_class#United_Kingdom


17 replies