Discover Hertford Online Forum

Archived Topic

Topic ID 2260

24/11/2006 by Blakey

Vandalism in Fore Street

To the 4 youths walking along Fore Street at 12.30 last night kicking bollards around may seem a bit of fun but to leave it lying in the middle of the road is dangerous. To the owner of the car whose windscreen wiper was ripped off by the same youths I am sorry that you had to wake up to such mindless vandalism this morning, I just wish I had been closer to the hooligans to do something about it. To the cab driver who then picked up these four, perhaps you now understand why I desperately tried to flag you down.


0 replies

Archived Replies

Reply ID 31331

24/11/2006 by James007

Did you phone the police Blakey?


Reply ID 31334

24/11/2006 by Blakey

I did not. I was too far away from the culprits to be able to recognise any key features and did not think to note the details of the taxi so did not think it worthwhile.


Reply ID 31336

24/11/2006 by Ewoowar

But if you the time then they only need to check the CCTV camera to get footage of the incident.


Reply ID 31345

24/11/2006 by James007

quote:
Originally posted by Blakey
I did not. I was too far away from the culprits to be able to recognise any key features and did not think to note the details of the taxi so did not think it worthwhile.
I give up...


Reply ID 31349

24/11/2006 by Blakey

Now reported.


Reply ID 31350

24/11/2006 by James007

quote:
Originally posted by Blakey
Now reported.
Nice one Blakey, top man! [:)]


Reply ID 31351

24/11/2006 by Ewoowar

There's an article in the Mercury this week about vandals who damaged cars in West Street. This wasn't reported immediately but the culprits were caught. It is always worth reproting.


Reply ID 31396

25/11/2006 by Leo Densian

This is not just a window. This is a Marks & Spencer window trimmed with finest stirling board, manufactured from quality softwood strands compressed and bonded together with exterior grade, water resistant resins. [V]


Reply ID 31401

26/11/2006 by Rooster

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
There's an article in the Mercury this week about vandals who damaged cars in West Street. This wasn't reported immediately but the culprits were caught. It is always worth reproting.
Not reported immediately? Are you absolutely sure? I think not! And the culprit (in the singular) has been apprehended and charged.


Reply ID 31412

26/11/2006 by Ewoowar

quote:
Originally posted by Rooster
quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
There's an article in the Mercury this week about vandals who damaged cars in West Street. This wasn't reported immediately but the culprits were caught. It is always worth reproting.
Not reported immediately? Are you absolutely sure? I think not! And the culprit (in the singular) has been apprehended and charged.
Yes, sure. As reported in the Mercury, the vandalism was witnessed by an owner of one of the cars that was damaged. He then drove after the culprits who told him that it was an accident, which he accepted, and he returned home to claim for the damage on his insurance. But he soon realised that damage had been caused to other vehicles in the street so he called the police. The accused was subsequently picked out of an identity parade. When I say this I do not wish to denigrate the efforts of the man who chased the vandals and phoned the police. The sooner you phone the police the better but even if you have missed the actual event it is still worth making the call.


Reply ID 31417

27/11/2006 by Rooster

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
quote:
Originally posted by Rooster
quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
There's an article in the Mercury this week about vandals who damaged cars in West Street. This wasn't reported immediately but the culprits were caught. It is always worth reproting.
Not reported immediately? Are you absolutely sure? I think not! And the culprit (in the singular) has been apprehended and charged.
Yes, sure. As reported in the Mercury, the vandalism was witnessed by an owner of one of the cars that was damaged. He then drove after the culprits who told him that it was an accident, which he accepted, and he returned home to claim for the damage on his insurance. But he soon realised that damage had been caused to other vehicles in the street so he called the police. The accused was subsequently picked out of an identity parade. When I say this I do not wish to denigrate the efforts of the man who chased the vandals and phoned the police. The sooner you phone the police the better but even if you have missed the actual event it is still worth making the call.
Ah ha! Say no more. You should know by now that you don't always believe what you read in the Mercury. Damage to cars was reported long before this unemployed teenager was actually caught in the act. You were not at the residents meeting with the police last week so you do not know all the facts. Sorry mate. Oh and it was one vandal not vandals.


Reply ID 31418

27/11/2006 by Ewoowar

That'll teach me to believe the Mercury. Still, I guess the main thing is that he was caught.


Reply ID 31448

27/11/2006 by Rooster

quote:
Originally posted by Ewoowar
That'll teach me to believe the Mercury. Still, I guess the main thing is that he was caught.
Absolutely!! We understand that the damage was being done with the handlebars of his BMX bike of all things.


Reply ID 34585

24/01/2007 by ambrose

How long before someone is seriously injured,by one of the dozens of youngsters riding bycycles in dark clothing and no lights through and on the footpaths of hertford town centre,and desecrating the War Memorial , as a skate park.When did you last see a Police Officer in Hertford, during midweek?may Traffic Wardens[bless em]take action? Or is it the slow action of local authority to implement a skate park?


Reply ID 34631

24/01/2007 by James007

You said "How long before someone is seriously injured?" You must mean "How long before one of the dozens of youngsters riding bicycles in dark clothing is seriously injured?". And you blame the local authority? WHAT THE HELL HAS A PROPOSED SKATE PARK GOT TO DO WITH "dozens of youngsters riding bicycles in dark clothing"? Parenting! Not another single excuse!


Reply ID 34642

24/01/2007 by Witch of the north

quote:
Originally posted by James007
You said "How long before someone is seriously injured?" You must mean "How long before one of the dozens of youngsters riding bicycles in dark clothing is seriously injured?". And you blame the local authority? WHAT THE HELL HAS A PROPOSED SKATE PARK GOT TO DO WITH "dozens of youngsters riding bicycles in dark clothing"? Parenting! Not another single excuse!
The poor little vandals (whoops sorry i meant darlings) have nothing to do. They don't have games consoles, TVs ,DVDs or computers like when we were children. They have nowhere to go as our town doesn't host any after school youth organisations. So let them have their skate park. I'm sure it will be used well and not vandalised within a month. I agree with you James007, it is down to parenting. Perhaps if parents were able to instill a sense of worth and a sense of wanting to better yourself into their offspring then the general public would not have to put up with these dark clad two wheeled wraiths that haunt the streets of our town at night. Teenagers that have hobbies and interests are not the ones that are found on the streets causing mayhem. We are lucky to live in an area where alot of people give their time and energy so that the local young have something to do and can learn new skills. It's sad to see so many that waste the time they have on their hands.


Reply ID 34672

25/01/2007 by Ray_by_the_Beane

Why do they ride such small bikes? is that the modern fashion?


Reply ID 34677

25/01/2007 by nora batty

quote:
Originally posted by Ray_by_the_Beane
Why do they ride such small bikes? is that the modern fashion?
[:D] Yes. They are BMX stunt bikes - even the adult size is small and they are designed in such a way that you stand up most of the time so that you can make turns in mid-air.


18 replies