Govia struggling..

For the customers of Greater Anglia, FCC and Network Rail
Post Reply
codek2
Posts:362
Joined:Tue 12 Nov, 2013 4:32 pm
Govia struggling..

Post by codek2 » Fri 19 Dec, 2014 4:28 pm

And doing their best to point the finger elsewhere..

http://www.thameslinkrailway.com/about- ... ourservice" target="_blank

Dan

Pharcyde
Posts:11
Joined:Wed 22 Jan, 2014 1:53 pm

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by Pharcyde » Fri 19 Dec, 2014 5:20 pm

But it's ok because all of the drivers are having a jolly old time at our expense.

User avatar
Capitalist Piglet
Posts:56
Joined:Mon 11 Nov, 2013 12:24 pm

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by Capitalist Piglet » Sat 20 Dec, 2014 12:49 pm

Pharcyde wrote:But it's ok because all of the drivers are having a jolly old time at our expense.
:?: :?:

pendodave
Posts:15
Joined:Mon 20 Jan, 2014 10:45 am

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by pendodave » Sat 20 Dec, 2014 6:39 pm

What a bizarre comment re. drivers.

The reason for the cancellations is that the franchisee has chosen not to recruit and train enough drivers to run the service.

They do this because it is cheaper (read : more profits for shareholders) than cancelling trains. Rest assured that if it was not the case, they would have enough of them.

Driver turnover is extremely low and very predicable. Hardly any leave until retirement. It is therefore extremely easy to plan to have enough. The key word is 'plan' because it takes at least a year to get a new starter up and running.

Even after years of fiddling with privatisation, our government still cannot put together a franchise agreement which makes railway companies employ enough staff to run a service. It's depressing and incredibly annoying at the same time.

In this particular case, it is probably not the fault of govia, but of First. They realised some time ago they weren't going to get the new franchise and just didn't bother to recruit any drivers to cover natural wastage. Such an obvious problem but for reasons beyond the wit of man (apparently) completely impossible for the govt to remedy.

Don't worry though. Senior management and shareholders will still have their bonuses and dividends (probably slightly larger than if they actually tried to run a service). And ex-ministers and senior civil servants will get their 'consultancies'...

newcomer
Posts:118
Joined:Mon 02 Dec, 2013 11:00 am

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by newcomer » Mon 22 Dec, 2014 4:10 pm

Sigh, I've just looked at trains back from KX late tonight and after 11pm it's a bus replacement from Alexander Palace and reason given is "Great Northern staff shortages".

This is really quite shockingly bad!

codek2
Posts:362
Joined:Tue 12 Nov, 2013 4:32 pm

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by codek2 » Mon 22 Dec, 2014 5:17 pm

A bus from AP is going to be painful. you'd probably be better off having another pint and getting the 5am train tomorrow :)

Ewoowar
Posts:100
Joined:Sat 30 Nov, 2013 6:26 pm

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by Ewoowar » Mon 29 Dec, 2014 2:54 pm

There were 'staff shortages' the week before on the journey from Hertford North to Moorgate in rush hour.

Staff shortages?

It's a train service.

I'm confused. Don't they allow for possible illness and hoilidays? Or do they simply choose to run with the minimum of staff and then stuff the passengers when there is an absence of drivers?

Perhaps if the multitude of inspectors were trained as drivers as well ( and yes, I know it is a job that requires a lot of training and skill ) they could stand in as drivers instead of warming their posteriors at Hertford North.

codek2
Posts:362
Joined:Tue 12 Nov, 2013 4:32 pm

Re: Govia struggling..

Post by codek2 » Tue 30 Dec, 2014 9:01 am

did you not read the link?

essentially FirstCC went very lean (obviously as they were losing it) and increasing staff cannot be done at the flick of a switch.

This will always happen whenever we change operators.

Post Reply