Rather obviously - that would be the case if the cars remained parked and never utilised the road but that's not very likely is it?!
Rather obviously - it would be safer because there would be no through traffic.
Statistics:Posted by Darcy Sarto — Fri 15 Aug, 2014 7:14 am
]]>
Rather obviously - it would be safer because there would be no through traffic.
Statistics:Posted by Razor — Thu 14 Aug, 2014 10:06 pm
]]>
Statistics:Posted by Darcy Sarto — Thu 14 Aug, 2014 4:16 pm
]]>
]]>
Herts County Council
B158 Old Cross,Hertford, is now open. Thanks for your patience. Traffic lights remain in place while @nationalgriduk continue gas works.
EDITED...Answered my own question after seeing the Mercury Link.
http://www.hertfordshiremercury.co.uk/O ... story.html" target="_blank
Statistics:Posted by Hertford Born & Bred — Wed 13 Aug, 2014 9:43 pm
]]>
[quote="Joby"
At the end of the day there are simply too many vehicles--both parked and in transit--in the area. I'd welcome a closure of Byde Street purely on safety grounds - I'd love my kids to be able to walk or ride to school by themselves but I just don't see how they will be able to with Byde Street to contend with.
In terms of safety, I think the illegal/inconsiderate parking to be equally as bad as the people who sometimes mount the pavement, if not worse considering that the parking means that any pedestrians particularly with buggies or disabled persons, at any time, are forced into the road. Is that really preferable? Even if you blocked it off, you would still have all the parked cars meaning peds would still be forced into the road, so how would that be any safer? Sort the parking out IMHO[/quote]At the end of the day there are simply too many vehicles--both parked and in transit--in the area. I'd welcome a closure of Byde Street purely on safety grounds - I'd love my kids to be able to walk or ride to school by themselves but I just don't see how they will be able to with Byde Street to contend with.
Rather obviously - it would be safer because there would be no through traffic.
All moot now. Old Cross re-opened so you can all stop rat running
Statistics:Posted by Darcy Sarto — Wed 13 Aug, 2014 9:31 pm
]]>
At the end of the day there are simply too many vehicles--both parked and in transit--in the area. I'd welcome a closure of Byde Street purely on safety grounds - I'd love my kids to be able to walk or ride to school by themselves but I just don't see how they will be able to with Byde Street to contend with.[/quote]
In terms of safety, I think the illegal/inconsiderate parking to be equally as bad as the people who sometimes mount the pavement, if not worse considering that the parking means that any pedestrians particularly with buggies or disabled persons, at any time, are forced into the road. Is that really preferable? Even if you blocked it off, you would still have all the parked cars meaning peds would still be forced into the road, so how would that be any safer? Sort the parking out IMHO
Statistics:Posted by Razor — Wed 13 Aug, 2014 8:19 pm
]]>
You can get all modern with it and have a rising bollard to allow residents access with the right code/pass/tag...
. I don't get this desire for taking "short cuts" that are a) affecting the amenity of people who live there and b) illegal! We, a long time ago, could drive straight down Port Vale to Herford North to avoid the Old Cross but we've learned to live without the "right"/privilege.Shall we start another topic or just ask admin to cut and paste one of the old ones so we can kick on?
Statistics:Posted by Darcy Sarto — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 7:52 pm
]]>
]]>
Your delay of 10-12 minutes is probably that short due to the number of motorists using the so-called "rat run", thus allieviating a long queue for you. As for not putting people and property at risk, do you not consider that the selfish parking of cars in that area contributes more to the safety issue than vehicles using the road for what it was intended for? (Yes, I know, risk of resurrecting old moans)
Old moans? Unusually for a rat-run discussion, this one has stay remarkably civilized.Regarding the parking...as a road user it's a problem due to poor visibility at junctions etc., but as a pavement user the most dangerous part is the bit at the bottom of Byde Street with the parking restrictions - the road is still effectively single lane due to cars parked on one side, but the lack of parked cars on the other side is an open invite to impatient motorists to mount the pavement when faced with oncoming traffic. I see this happen pretty much every time I travel up and down Byde Street. While walking the children to school in the morning I've had cars mount the pavement between me and my kids (walking 30 yards or so ahead) and must confess to a few red-mist moments.
At the end of the day there are simply too many vehicles--both parked and in transit--in the area. I'd welcome a closure of Byde Street purely on safety grounds - I'd love my kids to be able to walk or ride to school by themselves but I just don't see how they will be able to with Byde Street to contend with.
Statistics:Posted by Joby — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 5:49 pm
]]>
Darcy Sarto wrote:
Notwithstanding the current issues at the Old Cross which are acute and temporary I'm afraid I'm in the camp that feels the "Rat Run" should be blocked permanently (emergency services only gate) in the middle (probably halfway up Byde Street) to eliminate all this nonsense. My commute is through the Old Cross and when there isn't something exceptional like a sinkhole or temporary traffic management going on the "delay" from Bengeo Street to Gascoyne Way has never been more than 10 - 12 minutes in 15+years.
If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Your delay of 10-12 minutes is probably that short due to the number of motorists using the so-called "rat run", thus allieviating a long queue for you. As for not putting people and property at risk, do you not consider that the selfish parking of cars in that area contributes more to the safety issue than vehicles using the road for what it was intended for? (Yes, I know, risk of resurrecting old moans)Notwithstanding the current issues at the Old Cross which are acute and temporary I'm afraid I'm in the camp that feels the "Rat Run" should be blocked permanently (emergency services only gate) in the middle (probably halfway up Byde Street) to eliminate all this nonsense. My commute is through the Old Cross and when there isn't something exceptional like a sinkhole or temporary traffic management going on the "delay" from Bengeo Street to Gascoyne Way has never been more than 10 - 12 minutes in 15+years.
If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Statistics:Posted by buzz — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 5:06 pm
]]>
Yes, you are right, it is left into Balfour street. From the map I originally looked at it appeared that Wellington St continued past Byde St and that Balfour St started at the bend at the end of the road. Other maps do indeed show Balfour St starts at it's junction with Byde St. Apologies for confusion
Statistics:Posted by buzz — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 4:51 pm
]]>
Notwithstanding the current issues at the Old Cross which are acute and temporary I'm afraid I'm in the camp that feels the "Rat Run" should be blocked permanently (emergency services only gate) in the middle (probably halfway up Byde Street) to eliminate all this nonsense. My commute is through the Old Cross and when there isn't something exceptional like a sinkhole or temporary traffic management going on the "delay" from Bengeo Street to Gascoyne Way has never been more than 10 - 12 minutes in 15+years.
If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Harrumph harrumph!
I do, however, agree that in the current exceptional circumstances they could have made use of the rat run more sensibly but it would have needed some liaison with the residents which is too much to contemplate for something that might be over by Wednesday.
Just to note that I always use the Old Cross Route when travelling between Hertford North area where I live, and my close friend in Bengeo. I think it is the same time for each route once you have navigated the poor parking in Bengeo versus the traffic lights in Old Cross however I never make the journey in the rush hour.If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Harrumph harrumph!
I do, however, agree that in the current exceptional circumstances they could have made use of the rat run more sensibly but it would have needed some liaison with the residents which is too much to contemplate for something that might be over by Wednesday.
I did use the rat run on Sunday, but we just couldn't face going all the way back and out past Watton at Stone and it was Sunday evening so very light traffic.
Statistics:Posted by Kateg28 — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 4:23 pm
]]>
Notwithstanding the current issues at the Old Cross which are acute and temporary I'm afraid I'm in the camp that feels the "Rat Run" should be blocked permanently (emergency services only gate) in the middle (probably halfway up Byde Street) to eliminate all this nonsense. My commute is through the Old Cross and when there isn't something exceptional like a sinkhole or temporary traffic management going on the "delay" from Bengeo Street to Gascoyne Way has never been more than 10 - 12 minutes in 15+years.
If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Harrumph harrumph!
I do, however, agree that in the current exceptional circumstances they could have made use of the rat run more sensibly but it would have needed some liaison with the residents which is too much to contemplate for something that might be over by Wednesday.
I'd hate to see Byde Street blocked off as we live right by that corner and it would mean whenever we wanted to head to Welwyn or Sele at weekends (the only time our car is used) we'd have to go via town, which slows our journey. I walk to Hertford North daily and whenever the wife goes into town, she walks. Blocking Byde St doesn't really help the people that live right by that corner as that is the way most travel. One suggestion would be to stop all the double parking around the area. That would mean a wider road for cars and paths that people can actually walk on.If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Harrumph harrumph!
I do, however, agree that in the current exceptional circumstances they could have made use of the rat run more sensibly but it would have needed some liaison with the residents which is too much to contemplate for something that might be over by Wednesday.
Statistics:Posted by bubbaoshea — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 3:57 pm
]]>
If you want to gain the 10 -12 minutes you should get up 15 minutes earlier and not put people and property at risk for a selfish short cut!
Harrumph harrumph!
I do, however, agree that in the current exceptional circumstances they could have made use of the rat run more sensibly but it would have needed some liaison with the residents which is too much to contemplate for something that might be over by Wednesday.
Statistics:Posted by Darcy Sarto — Tue 12 Aug, 2014 3:24 pm
]]>